Mods vs Rockers in the 1960s : Creation of a Moral Panic

One weekend in 1964 residents and holiday-makers in the seaside towns of Brighton, Bournemouth and Margate, were rocked by a sudden influx of young, cool gangs. They were Mods and Rockers, and the culture clash that occurred that weekend, described in the articles below in The Daily Sketch, Daily Mirror and others, has become iconic in the history of youth culture. 

Mods and Rockers were easily identifiable by their distinctive clothing styles: the Mods wore Fred Perry and Ben Sherman designer suits, covered by a Parka jacket; while the Rockers wore leather biker jackets and jeans. Mods also rode European scooters like Lambrettas and Vespas and listened to a mix of Motown, ska and bands such as The Who. 

The Rockers favoured motorbikes and listened to American rock and roll such as Eddie Cochrane and Elvis. Although the movements were short-lived, violent clashes between the two gangs were seized on by the media and used by moralists to exemplify the outrageous liberties enjoyed by Britain’s youths. 

The seafront vandalism and violence described in the newspaper article was later made into the 1979 film Quadrophenia.

The video below shows how the media in the 1960s reported the clashes between mods and rockers and considers whether or not the media coverage exaggerated the scale of events leading to a 'moral panic' in relation to the behaviour of these youth subcultures.

This is evidence of historical creation of collective identity for British youth cultures. 

 

Question

In what ways do the media texts referenced above create a representation of young people as being a danger to society?

The media texts above all create the same representation that British youths were out of control 'wild' creating a fear of the youth cultures, isolating them from the rest of society. The use of words like 'battle', 'invade', 'take cover' and 'battlefield' leave inclinations of a war, one that society is waging against British youths by making it look like they 'attacking' the country and defying its social norms and threatening things middle-aged people+ have worked for.

Also since it hadn't been too long since WW2 words like 'battle', 'invade' and 'battlefield' will have people up in arms to defend their country for these 'wild' youths.

However, some articles even contradict themselves, because they're saying these 'hooligans' attack the towns and were out of control, but if this was so then why was a '50 year old' able to scare 200 away with a mop.